Why mathematics is so successful? | Education - Be Clever Students

In the old days people used mythological and religious subjects to encode all knowledge in the form of scientific and technical nature. Words and sentences are still widespread in many areas of humanities, pre-mathematical modeling and statistics, despite its use. Nevertheless, there is a strong math and unchallenged in the natural sciences. Why is this happening? What catapulted mathematics (in contrast to traditional logic) to the post in August for three centuries?

--> Mathematics is the language like no other. Nevertheless, they suffer from disadvantages to other languages. The structure of our language, their interconnectedness of the world and its limitations dictate our thinking and determine how we understand, describe and explain nature and our place in it. Of course, languages ??and living beings are constantly evolving (I think, slang, or the creation of an infinite number theories in mathematics.) But this is a formal grammar and syntax, logic, the straitjacket that hinders thinking ?outside the box? and the faithful fulfillment of impossible ?objective? reality. --> So, what has been done to develop the mathematics are so different and so is the winner? --> This is a versatile, portable, instantly accessible language that requires no translation. Idealists would say that this is a common intersubjectively. This may be because, as Kant and others suggested, or somehow related to mathematics is derived from a priori structures in the human soul. --> Built

2 This provides a high density of information, similar to the reduction. Only a few characters in formulas and equations, is the rich experience and encapsulate numerous observations. Mathematical terms and symbols do not correspond to physical objects or to cause or influence change reality, or in any way, shape or form. It can not be a mathematical structure or number card or construct or concept in the observable universe. This is because math is not limited to describe what is, or what is necessarily so ? and reflects what is possible to prove.

--> 3 Mathematics deals with patterns and laws. Thus, it can give predictions. Mathematics deals with shapes and patterns: some of them are in the material world, others only in the minds of mathematicians --> fourth Maths is a flexible, open source, flexible and extensible language. Consider, for example, introducing the concept of infinity and infinite numbers with relative ease, despite the controversy and threats faced with this, the foundations of traditional mathematics is ? or how advanced mathematics is aimed to deal with uncertainty and ambiguity. --> 5 Despite the above mathematics transigence invariant. Mathematical advance, no matter how secret or revolutionary, immediately recognizable and can be integrated into a fully-preserved body of knowledge. As the fluidity of mathematics does not come at the expense of consistency and nature. --> 6, there is a widespread belief or opinion that mathematics is certain, since it deals with a priori knowledge and the necessary truths (or are ?out there?, or spiritual in mind), but because it is an aesthetic (as the spirit Creator, the religious would add). --> 7 Finally, math is useful: it works. This is modern science and technology to be infallible and inerrant. Eventually, all branches of mathematics, but the dark demonstrate practical applications. --> Nevertheless, the riddle: What are mathematical objects? Or are they ?really? are (a kind of platonic), or they are mental fabrications? Knives and forks objects external to us. Do you have a goal ? or at least intersubjective ? existence. Presumably they will be there, even if no one watches or uses them ever again. We can safely call them ?education? --> Our feelings and thoughts can be transferred -. but they do not act, the message itself or its contents. They are ?subjective persons inside, it?s our existence as observers. --> And how about numbers? Number one, for example, has no goals, regardless of the status of observer. I do not mean number one, as an adjective, as in ?apple.? I respect him as an independent company. As a company, seems to stand alone in any case (there is), but subjectively (according to observers) in other respects. The numbers refer to the third category: ?forgive people.? This is a company whose existence, given their social agreement between conscious agents. --> However, this definition is so broad that it may well be useless. Religion and money are two examples of institutions that owe their existence, the social agreements between the conscious beings ? but did not beat us as universal, and there (goal) to make a number -->

In fact, this distinction is relevant and our definition can be refined accordingly.

--> We have to distinguish between ?social organizations? (eg, money or religion), persons present ?on. Social units are not universal, they are on society, culture and time they gave birth dependent. In contrast to the number platonic ideas created by an act of conscious agreement between all the means to achieve such an agreement. While conscious agents can be of value for money (ie the Internet), and argue about the existence of God ? no rational, conscious agent can be an argument against the number one Apparently category. any organization, free from the eternal dichotomy of internal to external. It?s convenient, and such. But this is only an illusion. dichotomies are not saved. The device will be awarded to the group of internal consent-conscious rational means ? but it?s beyond any one Agent (Individual) . --> In other words, a group of rational agents are aware of certain numbers to pay one. But every member of the group number one is external. It is through the power of the group, whose existence is given. On a separate point of view, it comes from the existence outside of it (with the group), and thus is external. The existence of a change in the frame of reference (from individual to group) is awarded. --> This is exactly how we relate something significant! We change our frame of reference and clear meaning. Death of a soldier makes sense from the standpoint of state and church rituals are important from the viewpoint of God. By shifting to identify the reference system, and we get it and meaning. --> If we give life and sense to get the same mental (cognitive) mechanism, which means that two processes are one and the same? Perhaps existence ceremony fancy term for a prose attribution sense? Perhaps we give meaning and, thus, the existence of a number on it ? Perhaps the existence of only the number of its meaning and no more? --> If so, all units must be given full value. In other words, all they have for their existence on observers (rational-conscious agents) depend. In this case, if all the people gone (as well as other intelligent observers), the numbers would cease to exist. --> We intuitively know that it is not. To prove that this is unlikely, however, is difficult. Nevertheless, the figures are confirmed by an independent , universal quality. Their existence depends on making intelligent observers in agreement. But there are opportunities as well as the ideas of Plato, such tendencies. You will have the agreement of intelligent agents, as well as for ectoplasm materialized spiritual environment to materialize. Agreement on group pass, they should be compensated rooms (with and others, the laws of physics) is materialized. --> We are creators. In making leads to new from the old. There are conservation laws that all companies, irrespective of the subject as the Supreme. We may change, revise, recombine physical and other surfaces. But we can not substrates from scratch. So everything must give or take, before allowing him to exist as we define it. This rule applies to persons who have received. -->, but --> Where people are involved, the source of eternal dichotomy of internal and external. The art uses the physical substrate, but outside the laws of interpretation and thus shows its significance (its existence as ART) is inferior. physical world contrast (similar to computer programs) contains both the substrate and operating procedures will apply the laws of nature are known. --> It is a source of conceptual there, confused. materialize in the figure, we see that already exists, we will take him and give him expression. But we are also obliged dichotomy of internal and external: the human dichotomy, with our false position as observers and with our ability to do self-examination has. Thus, we accidentally confused two issues through the application of this dichotomy, where it is not included. If we have the existence of a number is not it true that the number is external to us, and we learn, or want to give him the inside, and we can only pass on the street. It is both external and internal. by providing them with the existence of We accept only. In other words, it can not be that by interacting with us, the number of its changing nature (outside to inside or vice versa). --> With only realize something, and recognizing this new knowledge, we do not change their character. This is why meaning has nothing to do with existence, has given or not. The meaning of human categories. This is what we call cognitive experience of transition frames. This has nothing to do with people, only we. --> world does not have an internal and external. But what we do. And if we bestow existence of those we only acknowledge its existence. It exists as neural networks in the brain, or as some other companies (Platonic idea). But it exists and no amount of interaction with us people ever change. -->

Source: http://www.umdstudentsforpeace.org/why-mathematics-is-so-successful/

fabric fox sports maya angelou pineapple express champions league highlights chimera chaos faction 2